Showing posts with label Author of Urgent Care. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Author of Urgent Care. Show all posts

Tuesday, 9 February 2021

Innovating Wellness through Affordable Health Care: Minda Wilson Ep.34 T...


Today on the Sage Executive Podcast, join our host Robb Fahrion and his guest, Robert Menendez, as they talk about innovating wellness through affordable health care. Minda is an entrepreneur, author, investor, executive producer, Philanthropist, the Founder and CEO of Fluidity-Health, and President of KIPR. Learn more in the episode about how her company, Fluidity-Health, helps make peoples’ lives better! In this episode, you’ll learn: • Why she started her business Fluidity-Health • The best part about being a founder for Minda is meeting and getting to know great people. • Every business is a service business, and it all comes down to the relationships you build. • Making caregivers’ lives easier and helping patients save more money. • Never stop learning from everybody around you; they all have value. • And much more! ~ About Minda Wilson: Minda Wilson, J.D., M.B.A. is an author, entrepreneur and a corporate attorney, specializing in healthcare. A recognized expert and thought-leader on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, she consults with clients regarding its proper implementation. In addition to being the CEO of Fluidity-Health, a company she founded to provide tools and services that allow collaboration and coordination of care, she is also the Founder of Affordable Healthcare Review, an educational organization providing information about healthcare legislation, its application, and impact. Minda's passion and goal is to make quality affordable healthcare affordable for all.

• Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MindaWilsonUSA/​ • Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mindawilson...​ • Twitter: https://twitter.com/_mindawilson​ • Email: info@fluidity-health.com

• Phone: (818) 865-2828 • Website: https://fluidity-health.com/​ • Website: https://www.kipr.org


Thursday, 4 February 2021

Urgent Care - Featured Guest Glenn Klein, Author of “Wake Up Call”


Urgent Care - Featured Guest Victorianne Walton, "Its In The Genes"


Podcast: Minda Wilson | Urgent Care - Featured Guest Victorianne Walton Breast Cancer Advocate | Its In The Genes - https://youtu.be/WDQARrkOkIE Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/victorianne.russell.5 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/marylandsbigdiva Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/victorianne-walton-8bb21929

Urgent Care Featuring Sanjay Sehgal on HealthTech Moving Forward


Urgent Care - Featured Guest Sanjay Sehgal on Tech Health | https://youtu.be/ghwbflLWqCE Sanjay Sehgal has over two decades of executive management and entrepreneurial experience in industries comprising enterprise software, system sales, marketing, and operations. Over the years, he built successful engineering, sales, and marketing organizations; raised venture and strategic funding; involved in product development and launches; established and managed partner relationships with several industry leaders; and oversaw multiple company acquisitions. www.msystechnologies.com Connect with Sanjay Sehgal

Urgent Care - Featured Guest Dr Keith Kanner - Life Changing Program


Urgent Care - Featured Guest Dr Keith Kanner - Life Changing Program https://youtu.be/0FFAtEhr8Eg Dr. Keith Kanner developed a research-based 3-Month , 90-Minute a week Life Changing Program for Children, Teenagers, & Adults. This program combines a number of techniques and activities that have shown to expediate change over a 12-week period of time. Follow up studies confirm that the results last . Dr. Kanner Program is based on the combination of the following Theories : Learning Theory ; Normal Developmental Theory ; Attachment Theory ; Mindfullness Models and ; Exercise & Nutrition Guidelines.

Urgent Care - Featured Guest - Mia Roseberry For Wounded Warrior Home


The Wounded Warrior Home Project at Fort Belvoir brings together the Army, Clark Realty Capital, Michael Graves & Associates, IDEO, and numerous other partners to pursue a unified mission to drastically improve quality of life for the increasing number of Wounded Warriors returning to active duty at Fort Belvoir. In November 2011, our team unveiled two new single-family homes, radically redesigned to better meet the needs of these deserving soldiers' new "normal." We hope that this project functions as a model for new accessible homes nationwide and spurs a national dialogue about the importance of properly serving those who have served us. www.woundedwarriorhome.org Connect with Mia Roseberry

Urgent Care - Featured Guest - Rich Sagall Afford Your Medication


Rich Sagall - NeedMeds Educates and Empowers | https://youtu.be/XCjvxndz6Kk Episode #006 - NeedyMeds is a 501(c)(3) national non-profit that connects people to programs that will help them afford their medications and other healthcare costs. NeedyMeds educates and empowers those seeking affordable healthcare. Our vision is affordable healthcare for all. www.needymeds.org Facebook: Twitter: Instagram: Linkedin: Youtube: Blog: Pinterest:

Urgent Care - Featured Guest - Allen R Kates Copshock Surviving PTSD


Episode #007 Allen R. Kates, BCECR, MFAW https://youtu.be/3x2nwg6eaeA Trauma expert and journalist whose contact with police officers in the United States and Canada spans more than 35 years. He is author of the book, CopShock Surviving Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), praised as the definitive survival guide for PTSD sufferers. http://www.copshock.com/ PTSD is a greater cop killer than all the guns ever fired at police officers. Linkedin: Amazon: http://www.copshock.com/ptsd-symptoms.php

Urgent Care Featured Guest Roland Perez on American Health Journal


Episode #009 - https://youtu.be/QKfk8vEafHA | The American Health Journal is an award-winning 30-minute health care television series which has aired continuously for over 25 years. Now featured on PBS, each 30-minute episode features five 4 1/2 minute segments and a diverse range of health care professionals discussing the fullest spectrum of medical topics. Linkedin: Facebook: https://www.windsorbroadcastproductions.com/about-ahj.html https://www.thedoctorshow.com/about-ahj/our-team/

Urgent Care - Featured Guest - Brian Boyd Covid 19 and The Government


Podcast #008 Brian Boyd https://youtu.be/UEprX0xRrBI is a 30-plus year professional intelligence analyst and counter terrorism specialist. He is a former Green Beret, and was part of the leadership of the Joint Special Operations Command which oversees the Special Forces, Seal Team 6 and the Delta Force. He also served in the Departments of Defense, Justice & Treasury and regularly appears on radio and TV discussing intelligence matters www.boydintelligence.com The president's niece finally has her say today with the official launch of her book "Too Much is Never Enough: How My Family Created the World’s Most Dangerous Man”. The author, Mary Trump, is a clinical psychologist who examines her Uncle's upbringing and attempts to shed light on his personality. "For all intents & purposes this is a Trump hit job written by someone who knows him her entire life," says former White House staffer, Intelligence & Counter Terrorism Expert and former Green Beret Brian Boyd (see short bio below). It is an excerpt of Mary Trump writes, "Donald is much as he was at three years old: incapable of growing, learning, or evolving, unable to regulate his emotions, moderate his responses, or take in & synthesize information." Mary also writes about the president's father Fred who she claims "caused him terror," and scarred him for life. So how much of it is true - and does it matter? Linkedin: https://www.boydintelligence.com/ ===================================================

Urgent Care Featured Guest Dr Brad Spellberg Better Healthcare System


Podcast #010 | https://youtu.be/tfD5lENheq0 | Dr Brad Spellberg is Chief Medical Officer at the Los Angeles County-University of Southern California (LAC+USC) Medical Center. He is also Medical Director of Biosciences for Los Angeles County, working with the County CEO's office to implement the LA County Board of Supervisors vision to grow biosciences in LA. Dr Brad Spellberg has extensive administrative, patient care, and teaching activities. His NIH-funded research interests are diverse, ranging from basic immunology and vaccinology, to pure clinical and outcomes research, to process improvement work related to delivery of care, focusing on safety net hospitals. Linkedin Twitter: http://bit.ly/Podcast-010-Dr-Spellberg https://www.bradspellberg.com/

Saturday, 18 November 2017

The Tax Bill - Literally

The House of Representatives’ recently passed tax reform plan takes us another step closer to sending the middle class over the cliff’s edge and into the abyss. 

It is the double whammy,  increased taxes plus increased health insurance costs,  Though touted as the largest tax cut in history, the reality is that middle-class Americans will see almost no benefit from the bill.

First, by reducing the number of brackets, many will see their personal tax rates increase.  

In terms of healthcare, we are looking at 25% increases in healthcare costs for 2018.  In 2019, we can expect even greater increases.   Repealing the individual mandate means that people will not be punished for not obtaining health insurance.   If you run the numbers, for a family of 4, you will find that unless you are spending more than $30,000 per year on healthcare for your family, you are probably better off without it.  When calculating whether or not you can afford it, in addition to the direct costs of insurance and out of pocket expenses, you must also consider the cost of caretaking. If an adult is sick, you must consider the loss of income and the time off work to take care of him or her.  If a child is sick, you must also consider the full-time cost of care at home, the cost of transportation for not just your child but for you as well.  If managing these costs won’t bankrupt you and reduce your income to the poverty level, then you should consider getting insurance.  Once you reach the poverty level, you are eligible for Medicaid and healthcare for you and your family is free.

If you decide you can afford it, whether or not you choose to buy insurance becomes a decision about hedging risk.  Health insurance is supposed to be a protection against downside risk.  Simply put,  if you have health insurance, it should protect you from losing everything if someone in your family suffers a catastrophic illness.  Catastrophic means an illness that is either prolonged or very expensive to treat. 
As the middle-class moves closer and closer to the poverty line, this means more and more people will not buy insurance but choose to pay as they go; waiting until, when things get bad enough, they cross the poverty line and get free coverage.   It is estimated that 13MM Americans will forego health insurance in the next year.

It’s a vicious cycle, but with fewer people purchasing insurance, and even less young and healthy people in the mix, premiums in future, deductibles in future and, co-pays will rise.   For those who work for corporations who pay these costs, they will be asked to absorb more of the business’ health insurance costs.

If the Republicans really wanted to repeal Obamacare they could use the courts to do it.  The only argument the Supreme Court bought for the constitutionality of the ACA was that the  ACA, by virtue of the individual mandate, was a tax; a  tax on people who did not obtain healthcare. By repealing the individual mandate, Congress would be repealing the basis the court used the find the Affordable Care Act constitutional.  No mandate, no tax.  Once repealed, the Republicans can ask the Supreme Court to determine whether or not the ACA is constitutional.  If they get the likely answer, NO!, whatever remained of the legislation would be repealed.

But it's not just healthcare that the bill impacts, middle-class people should expect to pay more in taxes.

For the rich, the estate tax will be eliminated after six years.  In the meantime, the exemption for inherited wealth, the amount that is exempt from the taxation, has been raised to $11 million from $5.5 million.  Preferential treatment for investment income remains the same.   People who live primarily on investments, not pensions or other income, or who live on inherited wealth will benefit.  Otherwise, you are out of luck. 

To help pay for the tax cuts, the plan would eliminate most personal deductions, with the exception of deductions for mortgage interest, charitable contributions and state and local property taxes. The mortgage interest deduction would be capped for newly purchased homes up to $500,000, and the property tax deduction would be capped at $10,000.  According to Bankrate, median existing single-family home values are moving higher, averaging approximately $270,000 across the United States.  This means that people who already live in higher cost of living states would lose those deductions.  For example, if you live in the Bay Area, including Oakland, you are out of luck.   No deductions for you. 

The biggest deduction that would be eliminated is the one for state and local taxes. That deduction primarily helps people in blue states where taxes are higher.  That coupled with the elimination of the Alternative Minimum Tax, which affects working people who earn $75,000 or more, means that their taxes would go up. 

Small business entrepreneurs will be hit especially hard.  Not only will they lose their personal deductions, but the pass-through sole proprietorships, LLC’s, S-Corps, and/or partnerships they set up to protect them will now be subject to taxation.    There will be an additional 25% entity tax rate imposed.  Most pass-throughs that are owned by individual currently pay less than 25% of their income in taxes. 

The bottom line is if you are a working person, own a small business or are self-employed, your healthcare costs and your taxes are likely to go up.





Minda Wilson


Follow me Minda Wilson on:


Thursday, 3 August 2017

Why have we become so afraid of standing up

Why have we become so afraid of standing up to the insurance companies?

Anthem is pulling back from 16 of 19 pricing regions in California.  59 percent of current enrollment, about 153,000 California’s will lose their existing coverage in 2018 and will, hopefully, find another plan that allows them to keep their doctor on the exchange.


Brian Ternam, President of Anthem Blue Cross of California, said the individual market in California has become unstable so he believes they can no longer offer individual plans.

Trump is threatening to cut subsidy payments for low-income individuals.  


From the insurance company’s point of view, this means that, if an individual pays their portion of their insurance premium, even if the government doesn’t pay, the insurance company must pay their portion of all covered expenses for that individual.  To get the money the federal government owes them, the insurance company must sue the fed government to collect.


But Ternam’s statement is not true.  Anthem is offering individual plans, but only in 3 pricing regions.  They are doing this so that they do not lose their right to come into the market in 2019;  which would happen If they pulled out altogether.



 What is most interesting is that Dave Jones, the California Insurance Commissioner didn’t grow a pair and take a stand.

Even though Anthem is leaving 153,000 without individual coverage, Anthem will still be offering employer provided insurance, Medicare Advantage, Medicare Supplements Policies, Medical Policies, and grandfathered plans purchased before March 2010.



Since he has negotiated with insurance companies in the past, it seems that Commissioner Jones was very capable of cutting a deal.  “You, Anthem, want your business, Medicare, Medical plans approved; you want to do business in this state; you have to offer policies in all 19 pricing regions under the same terms and conditions as you are offering them in the 3 remaining regions.  You are either all in or all out!”  It is inconceivable that Anthem would choose closing its doors altogether rather than find a way to offer policies in the individual markets.

Why have we become so afraid of standing up to the insurance companies?  

Even without Anthem, there is sufficient interest from other carriers so that no pricing region in California will be without a coverage option.  If one door closes, another door will open.



Minda Wilson








Follow me Minda Wilson on:

Tuesday, 1 August 2017

What Happens If

What Happens If the President Pulls the Plug?



Everyone is worried about rate increases in the President pulls the plug.  That is the farthest thing from insurance company’s minds. The rate proposals for 2018 have already been submitted to the states.  Each state’s department of insurance is then responsible for reviewing and approving and/or rejecting the rate proposals.








If the rate proposals are accepted; the insurance companies are on the hook to offer insurance at the rates that they proposed.  If they are no longer willing to offer certain plans at the rates they originally proposed, the states have the absolute right to bring down the stick.

They are allowed to say to any insurance company “you don’t want to offer individual policies at an affordable rate to our citizens; then we will not let you offer the extremely lucrative Medicare and/or Medicare Advantage, and or group insurance programs, etc., that you want to offer in our state.

No individual plans mean you are out of business.  

Your license is revoked; you are done!  

If all the states decided to do this, then the CEO of United Health, who earned more than $100 million last year, would be out of a job.

It is that simple.

It is not Washington that can help you fight these massive increases it is your state government.




Minda Wilson



Wednesday, 26 July 2017

Republicans quickly reject their own revised bill


Yesterday, Senators voted for debate, not passage.  Once they agreed to debate the first thing the Republicans did was quickly reject their own revised bill,  the Better Care Reconciliation Act, once their leading proposal for repealing and replacing Obamacare.

The Senate rejected the bill, 43 to 57, despite having added a provision from  Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) favored by conservatives and another from Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) to court centrists worried about Medicaid cuts.

The Cruz provision allowed insurers to offer several plan types including cheaper plans that cover smaller ranges of benefits as long as that state offers one plan that has the broad coverage required by Obamacare


The Portman provision, the Medicaid wraparound, provides $200 billion dollars of support to states whose Senators were concerned about cuts to their Medicaid programs.  The incentive of $200 billion for their states was not enough. Of the 57 votes against, 9 were Republicans.




Minda Wilson

Thursday, 20 July 2017

Longer wait times to see a doctor, dramatic increases in the cost of insurance

"The Party’s Over"

With the death of the current incarnation of the Republican plan, we have to take a minute to consider what will continue to happen if nothing is done to repeal and replace or revise Obamacare.

The good news is that the expansion of Medicaid will continue and the federal government will continue to subsidize the states that cover those eligible for the expansion who apply.



This has had significant benefits by making working poor eligible for healthcare benefits.  In states like West Virginia, workers that are now covered have seen their wages increase, their children’s attendance at school increase and their use of the emergency rooms for medical treatments has significantly declined.  




That is where the good news ends.

In a large number of countries and in some states, there will be no carriers writing policies for coverage in the individual market.  That means that people who live in those counties/states will not be able to purchase health insurance of any type; and, the, in addition, they will be penalized for not buying insurance that is absolutely unavailable to them in any form.

For those that can purchase health insurance, including businesses, rates are expected to increase at least 20% for coverage next year.   Many companies are struggling to pay current premiums.  In certain states, including Texas, Connecticut, Maryland and Virginia, carriers have asked for premium increases in excess of than 50%.  A business that is struggling will be forced to drop their healthcare coverage.   If your business bought coverage and can no longer afford it, your employees may or may not be able to get coverage of their own, depending on where you live.

Co-pays will no longer be considered part of your co-insurance payments and, as such, may not count toward your deductible.  With individual deductibles on the increase from $2500 to as much as $5000, you might be surprised to learn that your co-payment will no longer count against your deductible.  This means that only co-insurance payments will apply.  Co-pays range from $45 to $115 per visit, depending upon the doctor.  Most plans now require a co-payment for all doctor visits and, in addition, you will be responsible for a co-insurance payment.  If you are on a 70-30 plan,  in addition to your co-payment you will be responsible for paying 30% of the amount billed to your insurance company.  This means that after you pay your co-pay, and the doctor bills the insurance company for the visit if the bill is $100 you will owe another $30 on top of your co-pay.  You now have to pay $75 for your visit, but only $30 counts towards your deductible.

The exchanges will continue to be funded by the government.  The exchanges duplicate 100% of the functionality provided by insurance company web sites. Since the taxpayers already paid for the cost of developing these insurance company sites, every year we support the exchanges we are paying again for something we already paid for.

The 5 million, plus, illegals that currently get healthcare paid for by the government will continue to receive this healthcare.  A number of subsidies paid will continue to be above and beyond what is really called for.  The Obama administration did not implement the electronic verification of citizenship nor did they implement the electronic verification of income.  Income and citizenship are input on the honors system.  We simply take your word.   Because all verifications are essentially done manually, if you claimed you were a citizen and you aren’t or you claimed an income below what you actually earned, you get the benefits you asked for.  Too bad for the tax payer!

Networks are going to get narrower.  It will get harder and harder to see a doctor.  Almost one-quarter of doctors are over 64, retirement or frustration will end their medical careers.  Since 2013, the year Obamacare went into effect, in addition to the loss of doctors due to changing careers or retiring, approximately 10% of doctors each year opt out and accept only cash.  This is especially true in the large cities and applies more specifically to professionals with excellent reputations who are tops in their fields.   These guys are so good, they can command any price, and people are willing to pay it. Why should they accept insurance when the reimbursement rates offered don’t cover the cost of doing business.

New doctors are not going into private practice; they are becoming part of large hospital systems and thus only take on patients that their hospital system will treat.  If your provider doesn’t have a contract with a big research facility and you have something that requires the sophisticated treatment such facilities can offer, you are out of luck unless you can pay for it.

The bottom line is this, the trends that started with the Affordable Care Act, less access to care, longer wait times to see a doctor, dramatic increases in the cost of insurance and even more dramatic increases in the out of pocket cost of care, will continue unless something is done.














Minda Wilson



Follow me Minda Wilson on:

Monday, 17 July 2017

Why is solving the healthcare crisis so hard

What the Heck is Going On?

It looks like the Senate has decided to stay in town while they try to put together a healthcare bill. I am sure their efforts are appreciated; but, it still seems that the focus of their efforts is not on helping American’s procure affordable health insurance.





Cutting entitlement program reimbursements to the states and providing money and tax incentives for insurance companies and their high net worth, high earning executives seems to be the Senate Republican’s solution to the healthcare problem.


Even if they maintain the capital gains taxes enacted under the Affordable Care Act, the current plan will still call for money and tax benefits specifically for insurance companies and their employees who earn more than $500,000.


This makes no sense. The promise, first by the Obama administration and now by the Trump administration, was affordability.  The solution is simple.  Catastrophic coverage coupled with the ability to put money away for future care in Health Savings Accounts.

Why can Christian Gifting Programs provide catastrophic coverage for their participants, which include more than a million Americans for less than $200 per month per person?  Under these plans, 100% of the cost of care for a catastrophic illness is paid after the first $500 is paid out of pocket.  If this coverage can be provided for approximately 1 million Americans at this cost, why can’t our government do the same?

In California, a Bronze HMO plan, the cheapest plan offered in California, costs $289.56 per month and has a $6300 deductible.   After you play your deductible, co-pays are $75 for your primary care doctor, $105 to see a specialist. In addition, you have a co-pays for tests, diagnostic exams, etc.  You are fully responsible for all bills if you go out of network and, if for some reason you become ill while you are not in California, only the initial ER care will be covered.  You will be fully responsible for any follow up or any other type of care.  This also does not include any co-insurance payments you might be responsible for.

When you compare, if you have a catastrophic event, you will have paid almost $100 more for your insurance, you will have paid out of pocket $6300 vs. $500 AND, you will be on the hook for any co-pays and co-insurance payments required.   Affordable?

Also, if we look at the difference in cost to the taxpayers between providing the HMO plan or the catastrophic plan for the 23 million people who are about to lose their insurance,

In addition to the more than $6000 each individual would save, we are also looking at a savings of about $27 billion dollars in savings in premium costs.

Enacting such a plan will result in no new taxes, will save the government billions of dollars in subsidies, will result in broader coverage and broader networks, and make healthcare affordable.  


So ask yourself this, 
"Why is solving the healthcare crisis so hard?"



Minda Wilson



Follow me Minda Wilson on:

Friday, 23 June 2017

The Senate Draft Plan is out and it is hard to believe

Affordability is Not Part of New Senate Plan
 
The Senate Draft Plan is out and it is hard to believe that it, again, failed to create some kind of solution to the ongoing issue, affordability of healthcare.   Key components include greater latitudes for states to opt out, the rollback of taxes, phase down of Medicaid expenses, and having subsidies based on income vs. age, but reducing these subsidies over time.

Phasing down of Medicaid means one thing, reduction in benefits.  It means a narrower network with fewer doctors and longer waiting lists and less access.


 
Rolling back of taxes means less money.  Less money means a bigger deficit.  As long as the government continues to subsidize healthcare the deficit will continue to grow.  One way they could save significant money would be to dismantle the exchanges, but it is not clear that that is the intention.

Subsidies based on income and not age makes tremendous sense.

Why would a person like Mark Cuban, 
who is under 65, need a subsidy?  

The people who need the money and need the care is where we should put in our safety net. 

It is surprising to consider, though, that in certain circumstances, the self-employed and/or those who must purchase individual policies may be better off without insurance.  The cost of a family policy is about $20,000+ dollars for 2018.  For those not eligible for subsidies, for example, someone making about $100,000, this is a significant expense.  In addition, the deductible for such a policy is about $2,500 per person; or about $10,000 for a family of 4.  Given this, you are looking at out of pocket expenses of about $30,000 after tax. Which means that, after paying taxes, of every dollar that is left, 35 cents will be going out for healthcare before the family has eaten, paid rent, bought clothes, paid for transportation, etc.  This is not workable.  It is unlikely that such a family will spend $30,000 on health care in any one year.  If they could save that money, or a significant portion of it to cover future catastrophic events, the family would be significantly better off.

As people on subsidies see their subsidized portion decrease, they will be in the same boat as the high earners who self-insure; except they will be earning less.

In reality, the fact that insurance costs $20,000 per family is where the problem is.  And, the fact that of that $20,000 so little, across the board, is actually spent on care, makes it more of a problem.  According to a study by the CDC, of all 18 to 64-year-olds, after subtracting the deductible from healthcare costs paid, insurance companies pay out less than 10% of the money they take in to cover the cost of care.

The solution is limiting administrative costs.  Cutting senior level compensation in the three largest insurance companies would allow significant reductions in policy costs.  So, if you look at it that way, if administrative costs were cut in half; a $9,000 savings could be achieved for next year and your policy, instead of costing $20,000, would cost $11,000.

Its our money the politicians are using to pay for these policies.  

Why couldn’t the politicians figure this out?