Showing posts with label Minda Wilson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Minda Wilson. Show all posts

Tuesday, 9 February 2021

Innovating Wellness through Affordable Health Care: Minda Wilson Ep.34 T...


Today on the Sage Executive Podcast, join our host Robb Fahrion and his guest, Robert Menendez, as they talk about innovating wellness through affordable health care. Minda is an entrepreneur, author, investor, executive producer, Philanthropist, the Founder and CEO of Fluidity-Health, and President of KIPR. Learn more in the episode about how her company, Fluidity-Health, helps make peoples’ lives better! In this episode, you’ll learn: • Why she started her business Fluidity-Health • The best part about being a founder for Minda is meeting and getting to know great people. • Every business is a service business, and it all comes down to the relationships you build. • Making caregivers’ lives easier and helping patients save more money. • Never stop learning from everybody around you; they all have value. • And much more! ~ About Minda Wilson: Minda Wilson, J.D., M.B.A. is an author, entrepreneur and a corporate attorney, specializing in healthcare. A recognized expert and thought-leader on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, she consults with clients regarding its proper implementation. In addition to being the CEO of Fluidity-Health, a company she founded to provide tools and services that allow collaboration and coordination of care, she is also the Founder of Affordable Healthcare Review, an educational organization providing information about healthcare legislation, its application, and impact. Minda's passion and goal is to make quality affordable healthcare affordable for all.

• Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MindaWilsonUSA/​ • Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mindawilson...​ • Twitter: https://twitter.com/_mindawilson​ • Email: info@fluidity-health.com

• Phone: (818) 865-2828 • Website: https://fluidity-health.com/​ • Website: https://www.kipr.org


Thursday, 4 February 2021

Urgent Care - Featured Guest Glenn Klein, Author of “Wake Up Call”


Urgent Care - Featured Guest Victorianne Walton, "Its In The Genes"


Podcast: Minda Wilson | Urgent Care - Featured Guest Victorianne Walton Breast Cancer Advocate | Its In The Genes - https://youtu.be/WDQARrkOkIE Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/victorianne.russell.5 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/marylandsbigdiva Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/victorianne-walton-8bb21929

Urgent Care Featuring Sanjay Sehgal on HealthTech Moving Forward


Urgent Care - Featured Guest Sanjay Sehgal on Tech Health | https://youtu.be/ghwbflLWqCE Sanjay Sehgal has over two decades of executive management and entrepreneurial experience in industries comprising enterprise software, system sales, marketing, and operations. Over the years, he built successful engineering, sales, and marketing organizations; raised venture and strategic funding; involved in product development and launches; established and managed partner relationships with several industry leaders; and oversaw multiple company acquisitions. www.msystechnologies.com Connect with Sanjay Sehgal

Urgent Care - Featured Guest Dr Keith Kanner - Life Changing Program


Urgent Care - Featured Guest Dr Keith Kanner - Life Changing Program https://youtu.be/0FFAtEhr8Eg Dr. Keith Kanner developed a research-based 3-Month , 90-Minute a week Life Changing Program for Children, Teenagers, & Adults. This program combines a number of techniques and activities that have shown to expediate change over a 12-week period of time. Follow up studies confirm that the results last . Dr. Kanner Program is based on the combination of the following Theories : Learning Theory ; Normal Developmental Theory ; Attachment Theory ; Mindfullness Models and ; Exercise & Nutrition Guidelines.

Urgent Care - Featured Guest - Mia Roseberry For Wounded Warrior Home


The Wounded Warrior Home Project at Fort Belvoir brings together the Army, Clark Realty Capital, Michael Graves & Associates, IDEO, and numerous other partners to pursue a unified mission to drastically improve quality of life for the increasing number of Wounded Warriors returning to active duty at Fort Belvoir. In November 2011, our team unveiled two new single-family homes, radically redesigned to better meet the needs of these deserving soldiers' new "normal." We hope that this project functions as a model for new accessible homes nationwide and spurs a national dialogue about the importance of properly serving those who have served us. www.woundedwarriorhome.org Connect with Mia Roseberry

Urgent Care - Featured Guest - Rich Sagall Afford Your Medication


Rich Sagall - NeedMeds Educates and Empowers | https://youtu.be/XCjvxndz6Kk Episode #006 - NeedyMeds is a 501(c)(3) national non-profit that connects people to programs that will help them afford their medications and other healthcare costs. NeedyMeds educates and empowers those seeking affordable healthcare. Our vision is affordable healthcare for all. www.needymeds.org Facebook: Twitter: Instagram: Linkedin: Youtube: Blog: Pinterest:

Urgent Care - Featured Guest - Allen R Kates Copshock Surviving PTSD


Episode #007 Allen R. Kates, BCECR, MFAW https://youtu.be/3x2nwg6eaeA Trauma expert and journalist whose contact with police officers in the United States and Canada spans more than 35 years. He is author of the book, CopShock Surviving Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), praised as the definitive survival guide for PTSD sufferers. http://www.copshock.com/ PTSD is a greater cop killer than all the guns ever fired at police officers. Linkedin: Amazon: http://www.copshock.com/ptsd-symptoms.php

Urgent Care Featured Guest Roland Perez on American Health Journal


Episode #009 - https://youtu.be/QKfk8vEafHA | The American Health Journal is an award-winning 30-minute health care television series which has aired continuously for over 25 years. Now featured on PBS, each 30-minute episode features five 4 1/2 minute segments and a diverse range of health care professionals discussing the fullest spectrum of medical topics. Linkedin: Facebook: https://www.windsorbroadcastproductions.com/about-ahj.html https://www.thedoctorshow.com/about-ahj/our-team/

Urgent Care - Featured Guest - Brian Boyd Covid 19 and The Government


Podcast #008 Brian Boyd https://youtu.be/UEprX0xRrBI is a 30-plus year professional intelligence analyst and counter terrorism specialist. He is a former Green Beret, and was part of the leadership of the Joint Special Operations Command which oversees the Special Forces, Seal Team 6 and the Delta Force. He also served in the Departments of Defense, Justice & Treasury and regularly appears on radio and TV discussing intelligence matters www.boydintelligence.com The president's niece finally has her say today with the official launch of her book "Too Much is Never Enough: How My Family Created the World’s Most Dangerous Man”. The author, Mary Trump, is a clinical psychologist who examines her Uncle's upbringing and attempts to shed light on his personality. "For all intents & purposes this is a Trump hit job written by someone who knows him her entire life," says former White House staffer, Intelligence & Counter Terrorism Expert and former Green Beret Brian Boyd (see short bio below). It is an excerpt of Mary Trump writes, "Donald is much as he was at three years old: incapable of growing, learning, or evolving, unable to regulate his emotions, moderate his responses, or take in & synthesize information." Mary also writes about the president's father Fred who she claims "caused him terror," and scarred him for life. So how much of it is true - and does it matter? Linkedin: https://www.boydintelligence.com/ ===================================================

Urgent Care Featured Guest Dr Brad Spellberg Better Healthcare System


Podcast #010 | https://youtu.be/tfD5lENheq0 | Dr Brad Spellberg is Chief Medical Officer at the Los Angeles County-University of Southern California (LAC+USC) Medical Center. He is also Medical Director of Biosciences for Los Angeles County, working with the County CEO's office to implement the LA County Board of Supervisors vision to grow biosciences in LA. Dr Brad Spellberg has extensive administrative, patient care, and teaching activities. His NIH-funded research interests are diverse, ranging from basic immunology and vaccinology, to pure clinical and outcomes research, to process improvement work related to delivery of care, focusing on safety net hospitals. Linkedin Twitter: http://bit.ly/Podcast-010-Dr-Spellberg https://www.bradspellberg.com/

Tuesday, 19 June 2018

What happened to the care in healthcare?


Money drove healthcare before, 
and it still does.  

Economics has always determined the type and quality of care you got.  

You picked and you paid. 

But its who gets the money that has changed.  

It used to be doctors; today its insurance companies

If a doctor is "in network", you can afford it. But it is the insurance company 
that determines the network, not you. 

For many, their closest in-network doctor is more than one hour away.  Some people, like me, are assigned primary care doctors that are more than 2 hours away from where they live.    As insurance companies continue to put financial pressure on providers, their ability to offer care will continue to decline.





Friday, 1 June 2018

Interesting Fact by Minda Wilson

This is Interesting... 

Did you know that in personal injury cases or worker's comp cases, Medicare is entitled to reimbursement for medical expenses paid on behalf of an injured person? 



This reimbursement is paid from the client's portion of recoveries from their case or from the settlement.  This means that you must pay Medicare back for any money they advanced to pay for your medical expenses before your case was resolved.






Worse, Medicare has stated that they take secondary status, which means they won't pay, for future accident related expenses until the settlement has been exhausted.





Minda Wilson


Follow me Minda Wilson on:




Monday, 28 May 2018

Vaccines are good! People who argue against them, Bad


It has been said that public confidence in vaccines is declining. 



The thing is the problem is not really with the vaccines; it is with the people who are waging a war against vaccination.

First, it was the people who felt that their children got autism because they were vaccinated.  In addition, Thimerosal, which is the preservative used in most vaccines is not given in a high enough dose to be impactful.  If you get a flu shot, you get less Thimerosal than you would get in eating half a tuna sandwich.  Unless you are allergic or have taken fish out your diet and your family’s diet.  You have no excuse of not getting vaccinated.  This has totally been debunked.
 
Second, the growing number of people who refuse to vaccinate their children is also a problem.  Diseases we once thought were eradicated in the US are now back.  Measles, mumps, polio, etc. are making a comeback.  The failure to vaccinate your children makes them vulnerable to people who carry these diseases.  People from all over the world come here to visit.  In certain places, over the generations, natural immunity to these diseases has developed.  This is because, like the Pilgrims who gave smallpox infected blankets to the Indians, the ones who survived developed an immunity and, through breastfeeding, hopefully, passed it down.  Those who missed exposure, such as prior generations who received vaccinations, had nothing to pass.  If you choose not to vaccinate your child, you are putting them at risk.

Publicity about the recurrence of these diseases, makes people think that it is the vaccinations that are no good.   This is far from the truth. It is the failure to vaccinate that has brought back these diseases from the brink of extinction.

Third, and very sadly, the strains picked to put in the flu vaccinations, in recent years, have missed the mark.  This has made very vulnerable people who are exposed become very sick.  Some have even died. It is the mismatch, not the vaccination. Studies have shown that if you are vaccinated every year, over time, you can develop a broader spectrum of immunity against any type of flu. This means that if you do get sick, you will be less sick, than if you had been exposed to the same strain of flu without any immunity.

The most important thing in all this is that skipping vaccinations puts you and your family at risk.



Minda Wilson


Follow me Minda Wilson on:



Monday, 18 December 2017

What Saying Goodbye to Net Neutrality Means for Healthcare

On November 12, the FCC put an end to protections that stopped service providers from charging different amounts of money to stream different kinds of content. Net neutrality protections bar internet service providers, or ISPs, from blocking, slowing, or providing preferred treatment to particular sites and services. The rules are designed to prevent ISPs from charging companies for transmitting their website and/or transmitting data to their customers, from censoring content, or even from blocking websites altogether.  ISPs now have the right to control access and to discriminate.

These changes, therefore, will allow ISPs to charge healthcare service providers additional money for transmitting life-saving data ahead of movies, "snapchats", or any other content provided by those who pay a premium for faster internet access and services.  Most of the recent legislation covering technology and healthcare focused on Electronic Medical Record system (“EMR”) implementation, the patient’s right to access their data, and the requirement that providers change from fee for service reimbursement to value-based care.  All of these require data access to be successfully implemented. The emphasis on delivering services at home to patients also requires providers have access to data from remote locations.  The assumption behind value-based care assumes real-time access to data through the internet.  Implementation of these programs are a work in progress.

Today, most patient data is housed in electronic medical record systems. Each facility has its own EMR and, for the most part, none of these systems talk to each other. Even though the law clearly provides for a patient’s absolute right to their medical data, the siloed nature of these systems allows the EMR companies to believe that they have the right to control access to the patient data contained within them.  Medical providers are given controlled access to their data only to data on an EMR they purchased.  Anyone that does not have direct access to an EMR system, the patient and those involved with the care of the patient, only have access to their data if they physically retrieve it.  The system works badly.  Congress has made an attempt to fix this problem. Interoperability and electronic access to data has now been mandated.  Though not surprising, EMR companies are fighting its implementation.

Congress also passed legislation that moved us from fee for service reimbursement to value-based care.  The ability to calculate value requires large amounts of patient data.  The ability to aggregate health system data from all disparate Electronic Health Records being used within a given health network is a requirement to determine the quality and the relative performance value of providers.  

As part of the move to value-based care, patients are receiving more of their care at home and reporting on the results to their providers.  Telehealth, health monitoring on site by the patient or by a caregiver, the use of apps to replace different types of therapy, all are being introduced to reduce costs and increase care quality. 

Net neutrality meant that your healthcare data did not have to stand in line behind companies and service providers who pay for faster speed and priority access.  It meant that the notification to the hospital from your home EKG unit that you are having a heart attack would not have to stand in line behind someone’s streaming video. 

This will no longer be the case.  Ability to access data, not on your own EMR system can be so slow, it is painful; patient portals to review data will not operate in real time.  Use of applications that transmit data to providers will become less and less valuable without the ability to provide immediate feedback on a patient’s condition.

EMR companies are fighting tooth and nail to block interoperability and to prevent access to their systems by anyone but the provider who paid for it.  Eliminating net neutrality gives them another tool in the box to block interoperability.  Their ability to purchase the right to exclude shared data without paying a fee to them will make it more difficult for patients to have access to their own medical data.

Priority access will go to people who have the deepest pockets.  In healthcare, insurance companies have the deepest pockets.  It is extremely unlikely that insurance companies will reimburse providers for the cost of access to faster data.  Since insurance companies are unwilling to increase reimbursements to hospitals for these increased costs and hospitals work on razor thin margins; hospitals are unlikely to be able to absorb the costs of priority access. 


So if the consumer can’t pay more, and the hospital can’t pay more and the insurance company won’t pay more, priority data access is not going to be provided, even for life-saving communications.

Unless Congress acts, we the people have no recourse or no options to turn this around. 

You can’t put supporting the poor and the rich and the government on the back of the middle class.



Minda Wilson


Follow me Minda Wilson on:





Saturday, 18 November 2017

The Tax Bill - Literally

The House of Representatives’ recently passed tax reform plan takes us another step closer to sending the middle class over the cliff’s edge and into the abyss. 

It is the double whammy,  increased taxes plus increased health insurance costs,  Though touted as the largest tax cut in history, the reality is that middle-class Americans will see almost no benefit from the bill.

First, by reducing the number of brackets, many will see their personal tax rates increase.  

In terms of healthcare, we are looking at 25% increases in healthcare costs for 2018.  In 2019, we can expect even greater increases.   Repealing the individual mandate means that people will not be punished for not obtaining health insurance.   If you run the numbers, for a family of 4, you will find that unless you are spending more than $30,000 per year on healthcare for your family, you are probably better off without it.  When calculating whether or not you can afford it, in addition to the direct costs of insurance and out of pocket expenses, you must also consider the cost of caretaking. If an adult is sick, you must consider the loss of income and the time off work to take care of him or her.  If a child is sick, you must also consider the full-time cost of care at home, the cost of transportation for not just your child but for you as well.  If managing these costs won’t bankrupt you and reduce your income to the poverty level, then you should consider getting insurance.  Once you reach the poverty level, you are eligible for Medicaid and healthcare for you and your family is free.

If you decide you can afford it, whether or not you choose to buy insurance becomes a decision about hedging risk.  Health insurance is supposed to be a protection against downside risk.  Simply put,  if you have health insurance, it should protect you from losing everything if someone in your family suffers a catastrophic illness.  Catastrophic means an illness that is either prolonged or very expensive to treat. 
As the middle-class moves closer and closer to the poverty line, this means more and more people will not buy insurance but choose to pay as they go; waiting until, when things get bad enough, they cross the poverty line and get free coverage.   It is estimated that 13MM Americans will forego health insurance in the next year.

It’s a vicious cycle, but with fewer people purchasing insurance, and even less young and healthy people in the mix, premiums in future, deductibles in future and, co-pays will rise.   For those who work for corporations who pay these costs, they will be asked to absorb more of the business’ health insurance costs.

If the Republicans really wanted to repeal Obamacare they could use the courts to do it.  The only argument the Supreme Court bought for the constitutionality of the ACA was that the  ACA, by virtue of the individual mandate, was a tax; a  tax on people who did not obtain healthcare. By repealing the individual mandate, Congress would be repealing the basis the court used the find the Affordable Care Act constitutional.  No mandate, no tax.  Once repealed, the Republicans can ask the Supreme Court to determine whether or not the ACA is constitutional.  If they get the likely answer, NO!, whatever remained of the legislation would be repealed.

But it's not just healthcare that the bill impacts, middle-class people should expect to pay more in taxes.

For the rich, the estate tax will be eliminated after six years.  In the meantime, the exemption for inherited wealth, the amount that is exempt from the taxation, has been raised to $11 million from $5.5 million.  Preferential treatment for investment income remains the same.   People who live primarily on investments, not pensions or other income, or who live on inherited wealth will benefit.  Otherwise, you are out of luck. 

To help pay for the tax cuts, the plan would eliminate most personal deductions, with the exception of deductions for mortgage interest, charitable contributions and state and local property taxes. The mortgage interest deduction would be capped for newly purchased homes up to $500,000, and the property tax deduction would be capped at $10,000.  According to Bankrate, median existing single-family home values are moving higher, averaging approximately $270,000 across the United States.  This means that people who already live in higher cost of living states would lose those deductions.  For example, if you live in the Bay Area, including Oakland, you are out of luck.   No deductions for you. 

The biggest deduction that would be eliminated is the one for state and local taxes. That deduction primarily helps people in blue states where taxes are higher.  That coupled with the elimination of the Alternative Minimum Tax, which affects working people who earn $75,000 or more, means that their taxes would go up. 

Small business entrepreneurs will be hit especially hard.  Not only will they lose their personal deductions, but the pass-through sole proprietorships, LLC’s, S-Corps, and/or partnerships they set up to protect them will now be subject to taxation.    There will be an additional 25% entity tax rate imposed.  Most pass-throughs that are owned by individual currently pay less than 25% of their income in taxes. 

The bottom line is if you are a working person, own a small business or are self-employed, your healthcare costs and your taxes are likely to go up.





Minda Wilson


Follow me Minda Wilson on:


Friday, 13 October 2017

Unaffordable Healthcare

Trump’s latest Executive Order is another swipe at Obamacare, but it does not repeal or replace it.
In general, the executive order has no force of law itself. What it does do is influence how regulations are put together. It is those regulations that represent how a law is implemented and how it is enforced.  Trump’s executive order asks three federal agencies to consider possible new regulations that could help achieve certain goals, like providing more policy options for the young, allowing small business associations to provide health insurance plans that cross state lines and expanding access to short-term insurance policies, those that offer coverage for 90 days or less. It is not clear what those rules will say.

Previously Trump issued an executive order that let a broader range of employers stop offering free contraception through their healthcare plans.  It said that regulations should interpret the Supreme Court Hobby Lobby decision to enable employers who have a sincerely held moral and/or religious convictions to opt out of the free contraceptive benefit currently in their policies.  Loosely interpreted, an employer could be morally opposed to paying more for healthcare. 


Anytime a benefit is excluded from a policy, the plan costs less. If you find paying more for health insurance morally offensive, you can now opt out of providing free contraception. It is that simple.

The other thing Trump can do is use Executive Orders to curtail the activities of the executive branch of government.  This allowed Trump to use executive orders to shut down the Affordable Care Act website for 12 hours every Sunday during open enrollment, cut the budget by 40% that funds groups that help people enroll, and cut the advertising budget for the ACA from $100 million to $10 million.  Such actions make it less likely people will enroll.     In addition, his decision to limit enforcement of the ACA has wide consequences.  Knowing that the individual mandate is unlikely to be enforced and the companies will unlikely be penalized for not offering insurance makes it less likely those people will purchase expensive exchange policies.


Trump is seeking to end subsidies paid directly to health insurance companies that help low-income people.  He wants that money paid directly to the states instead.   Trump is also seeking to eliminate the exclusivity requirement that all plans be conforming to the ACA and offer the essential health benefits, such as well-care like physicals and/or preventative care like mammographies, as defined in the Affordable Care Act.

The real impact of these executive orders will be felt by the self-employed, the working poor, and the middle class.  What this means is that those who are not covered by group benefit plans, plans provided by their employer, are going to be unable to purchase health insurance.  Not because it won’t be available, that is a false premise.  They won’t be able to buy it because what will be available will be unaffordable.  This year, in California, a policy covering two adults in their 50’s and their grown child will likely cost more than $20,000, with a $10,000 deductible and copays of $70 for specialist visits.   Because of the exodus of young people into lower costs products that will likely result from the implementation of the executive order, the increase in the cost of this same policy could be up to 40% or more.  What family can afford $42,000 in payments before the insurance company contributes their first dollar?

It should be noted that the states, not the federal government, set policy prices.  Policy prices for 2018 have been set.  At this point, states are not authorizing new policy types or increases in costs to offset the uncertainty.   What happens in 2019, at this point, is unknown.  In California, is an insurance company pulls out of the state, they have to wait 3 years to come back in.  Insurance commissioners can stop the exodus of insurance companies by either making them be all in or all out.  We will have to wait and see if more carriers pull out and if state insurance commissioners hold the line on cost.

Remember, State Insurance Commissioners are politicians and subject to influence.  If you are angry, this is the place where your voice can be heard.  



Minda Wilson


Follow me Minda Wilson on:

Saturday, 7 October 2017

Insurance Companies They Should Be Shot


Today, CIGNA announced that they will not cover the opioid OxyContin for customers who are insured through a job, starting in 2018.  CIGNA last year said it wanted to cut opioid use by 25 percent among its customers by 2019.

What about those who suffer from bone cancer?  While Angela was sick the pressure from her cancer cracked open her bones.  She uses opioids, including Oxy-Contin, every day to cope with the pain.  She tried marijuana, it wasn’t enough.  Prior to taking her current medication, each day the pain of putting weight on her broken bones would send her into spasms until she curled up into a ball. 

She suffered terribly while she was sick.  After months of treatment, a miracle occurred and she went into remission.

After struggling to survive cancer, she still needs these drugs.  The bones in her feet and ankles were broken beyond repair.  Every time she put any kind of weight on them, excruciating pain would shoot up her legs.  She found that by taking opioids she could manage the pain and even walk with a walker.  Being mobile allowed her to get out of the house on her own, resume a semi-normal life, and be happy.  Take the pills away and she returns to a life of suffering, the pain of walking on broken feet and breathing with broken ribs that cannot be repaired.

Angela is covered under her husband’s plan which means that she can, starting in 2018 be denied coverage for her opioid prescription.  Who is her insurance company to say that she is not entitled to the drugs that make her able to play with her grandkids, read a book, or watch TV without curling into a ball of pain?

The insurance companies say that OxyContin is addictive and by not allowing access to the drug, they are preventing people from becoming addicts.   

"Our focus is on helping customers get the most value from their medications — this means obtaining effective pain relief while also guarding against opioid misuse," said Jon Maesner, Cigna's chief pharmacy officer on Wednesday.

They said that they “might” allow prescriptions to be honored that they determine are medically necessary?  What this means is that people like Angela, who are in horrific pain, will have to wait each month until the insurance company decides its OK to give her her medicine.  Who are they to determine what is medically necessary and what is not?  They are not doctors, they have not seen any of the patients whose treatment they are denying?   Does this mean that if they don’t want to pay for it you can still get the prescription if you pay for it yourself?  Isn’t that just another way of insurance companies avoiding payment for things you thought you were covered?

Because some bad doctors and some bad people have abused their prescriptions, CIGNA is deciding they are going to deny life-saving treatment to those who are in need.  When did the insurance company staffers start practicing medicine?   How is it possible that in most states, it is illegal for people to practice medicine without a license, criminal to write prescriptions without a license, and yet, these companies are deciding how much of what drug you can take and for how long?

Maybe the real issue is that they want to save money?  Did anyone consider that?  Doctors who comply with the law provide oversite to try and determine whether their patients have become addicted to opioids.  Today, doctors write prescriptions one month at a time.  If they want their prescriptions renewed, they have to visit their doctor monthly; urine tests must be run to assess the level of drugs in their system.  In addition to the prescription, all this costs money that the insurance company is under an obligation to support.  Perhaps instead, they should monitor doctors who do not put people on a monthly cycle by checking visits and urine test charges?   I thought doctors were supposed to determine how sick you were, and prescribe accordingly?

CIGNA is clearly making medical decisions about what treatment patients should receive. What insurance companies are supposed to do if a doctor deems a treatment is medically necessary is pay for it.  That is why you bought the insurance in the first place.  

That they do what they are supposed to so should not be the exception rather than the rule. Of course you have to meet your deductible and pay your co-pay if those things apply; but, otherwise, insurance companies are not supposed to step into the shoes of your doctor and decide what is medically necessary and what is not.



Minda Wilson


Follow me Minda Wilson on: